2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Chrysler 300 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (335 HP) has 295 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 632 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Master RR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 75 L |