2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1988 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | Crossfire | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |
