2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2008 Holden UTE

To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (325 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Crossfire 2008 Holden UTE
Make Chrysler Holden
Model Crossfire UTE
Year Released 2004 2008
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3296 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 325 HP 357 HP
Torque 420 Nm 530 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors