2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1980 Ford Thunderbird

To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 463 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.

Because 1980 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1980 Ford Thunderbird
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Grand Voyager Thunderbird
Year Released 2004 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 4186 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 145 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1943 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2760 mm