2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | C2 | XJ-13 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 4990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1000 mm |