2004 De Tomaso Guara vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 De Tomaso Guara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 De Tomaso Guara would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 De Tomaso Guara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 De Tomaso Guara (301 HP) has 222 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 De Tomaso Guara should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2004 De Tomaso Guara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 De Tomaso Guara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 De Tomaso Guara (414 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 De Tomaso Guara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 De Tomaso Guara | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
| Model | Guara | Micra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 414 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2449 mm |
