2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (95 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 571 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dakota | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 47 L |