2004 Dodge Durango vs. 1982 Dodge 600

To start off, 2004 Dodge Durango is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 954 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (319 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.

Compare all specifications: