2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 BMW 116
To start off, 2012 BMW 116 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2012 BMW 116. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 116. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 116 weights approximately 179 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Because 2012 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 116 (260 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 116 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Neon | 2012 BMW 116 | |
| Make | Dodge | BMW |
| Model | Neon | 116 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4239 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1748 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 51 L |
