2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 790 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | E-250 | CL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 315 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |