2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2009 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2009 Mercury Milan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Milan. (221 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Milan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Milan weights approximately 509 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Milan. (278 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Milan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2009 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | F-150 | Milan |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 278 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 12.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1832 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 66 L |