2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2012 Ford Flex
To start off, 2012 Ford Flex is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2012 Ford Flex. (262 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Flex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Flex weights approximately 705 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Flex. (336 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2012 Ford Flex | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | F-150 | Flex |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 336 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |