2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 392 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1985 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Mustang | Reliant |
Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2260 mm |