2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 750 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-150. (389 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 389 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 132 L |