2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Ford Tempo

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 532 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: