2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 317 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ranger 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Ranger Lancer
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2983 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 198 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1642 kg 1325 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4572 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1763 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1491 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.7 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 59 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]