2004 Ford Taurus vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (245 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Taurus | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |