2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC90. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 243 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Canyon | XC90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2198 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |