2004 GMC Safari vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (191 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 171 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 273 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1793 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 76 L |