2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-7. (235 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (489 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-7. (351 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 235 HP |
Torque | 489 Nm | 351 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4250 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 69 L |