2004 Honda CR-V vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda CR-V (160 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda CR-V | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | CR-V | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |