2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 924 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | Rodeo | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 376 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 544 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 102 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1955 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 17.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 100 L |