2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC

To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC weights approximately 1066 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC (351 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC
Make Jeep Mercedes-Benz
Model Grand Cherokee CLC
Year Released 2004 2011
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3966 cc 3498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 195 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 351 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 92.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87 mm 86 mm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1764 kg 2830 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 6.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 62 L