2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
Model | Range Rover | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |