2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (280 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 671 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Lincoln | Lincoln |
| Model | LS | Continental |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 284 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3210 mm |
