2004 Lincoln Navigator vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Navigator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Navigator would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (301 HP) has 148 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1206 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (481 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln Navigator | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Lincoln | Mercury |
Model | Navigator | Sable |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2719 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 68 L |