2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 563 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (281 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 794 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 637 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Lotec | Jeep |
Model | C 1000 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1839 mm |