2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1961 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Riley One-Point-Five is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1961 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1961 Riley One-Point-Five. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Riley One-Point-Five weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Riley One-Point-Five (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1961 Riley One-Point-Five will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Crossblade | 1961 Riley One-Point-Five | |
Make | MCC | Riley |
Model | Crossblade | One-Point-Five |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2190 mm |