2004 MG ZT vs. 1966 MG 1100
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1966 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1966 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 660 kg more than 1966 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MG ZT | 1966 MG 1100 | |
| Make | MG | MG |
| Model | ZT | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1096 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |
