2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 397 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mini |
Model | Endeavor | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 47 L |