2004 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 1967 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 2,350 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 1088 kg more than 1967 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi L 200 | 1967 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | L 200 | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2280 mm |