2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 426 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Outlander | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1596 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |