2004 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Pajero | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Pajero | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |