2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2000 Citroen C3
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 233 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2000 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | Armada | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |