2004 Nissan Titan vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2004 Nissan Titan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Titan. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Titan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 52 kg more than 2004 Nissan Titan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. (499 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Titan | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Titan | Park Ward |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 499 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2398 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 100 L |