2004 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2004 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan X-Trail | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | X-Trail | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
