2004 Pagani Zonda vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 272 more horse power than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2012 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 498 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Pagani Zonda | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Pagani | Cadillac |
Model | Zonda | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4395 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2055 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1151 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |