2005 Acura CL vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 Acura CL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2005 Acura CL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura CL | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | CL | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |