2005 Acura CL vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Acura CL. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura CL.

Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura CL. (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura CL.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Acura CL 2010 Jaguar XJ
Make Acura Jaguar
Model CL XJ
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 4200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 297 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 294 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4970 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 85 L