2005 Acura NSX vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 2005 Acura NSX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura NSX (286 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2005 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura NSX | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | NSX | 960 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2780 mm |