2005 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,969 cc, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (116 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | 156 | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1558 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |