2005 Audi TT vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 510 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |