2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 1966 BMW 1602
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 1602 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 1966 BMW 1602 | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | FW 27 | 1602 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1574 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1420 mm |
