2005 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 1390 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW X5 (520 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | BMW | Triumph |
| Model | X5 | Herald |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 520 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 29 L |
