2005 BMW X5 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2005 BMW X5 and 2005 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP) has 145 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 1426 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW X5 (520 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW X5 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | X5 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 520 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1810 mm |