2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 562 kg more than 2005 Buick LaCrosse.
Because 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Buick | Rolls-Royce |
Model | LaCrosse | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 107 L |