2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (200 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 634 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Buick | Mercury |
| Model | LaCrosse | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 954 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2400 mm |
