2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Cadillac | Wartburg |
Model | DTS | 312 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2460 mm |