2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1997 Chrysler CCV
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler CCV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler CCV would be higher. At 4,700 cc, 1997 Chrysler CCV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac XLR | 1997 Chrysler CCV | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | XLR | CCV |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 4700 cc |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |