2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (205 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 68 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (271 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Cobalt 2003 Mazda Tribute
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Cobalt Tribute
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 205 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 175 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1357 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 57 L